so we're commissioning 2 new aircraft carriers (currently) budgeted @ £3.2bn although total costs expected £4bn (~$6.3bn/$7.9bn us). hms queen elizabeth , hms prince of wales (ooohhh, scary!).
don't have problem them spending money, need them imo. i'm confused , disappointed further details read here.
our £2bn ($3.96bn) (per carrier) that:
- gas powered (refuelling costs!?)
- no launch catapult
- carries 40 jets (which need vertical take off - more expensive)
- 60,000 tons
~$2bn (£1.09bn) £2.2bn ($4.5bn) us get:
- nuclear powered
- launch catapult
- carries 85 jets (which don't have vertical take off)
- 100,000 tons
- bad-ass
i know costs aren't simple that. still though, costs double, , isn't match our counterparts. if we're going spend billions, @ least our monies worth, please?
i'm sure i'm missing important details, enlighten me?
the 1 costs more $4.5bn , bulk discount they've built fair few of them reduces design costs ect.
nuclear ones cost on billion refuel every 33 months.
Forums Mac Community Politics, Religion, Social Issues
- iPhone
- Mac OS & System Software
- iPad
- Apple Watch
- Notebooks
- iTunes
- Apple ID
- iCloud
- Desktop Computers
- Apple Music
- Professional Applications
- iPod
- iWork
- Apple TV
- iLife
- Wireless
Comments
Post a Comment